Gerald Gault, who was 15-years-old, was taken into custody based on a complaint … At the station, the deputy told Gerald’s Appellants' 15-year-old son, Gerald Gault, was taken into custody as the result of a complaint that he had made lewd telephone calls. 1. Facts of In re Gault . This decision was the turning point for the rights of juveniles in U.S. Courts. The petition sought the release of Gerald Francis Gault, appellants' 15-year-old son, who had been committed as a juvenile delinquent to the State Industrial School by the Juvenile Court of … Gault Case Changed Juvenile Law In 1967 a landmark U.S. Supreme Court decision gave juveniles accused of crimes the same due process rights as adults. Throughout the questioning, Jerry continued to assert that the phone call had been made by … The Court ruled that juveniles (children and teenagers) have the same rights as adults when they are accused of a crime.For example, they have due process rights, like the right to have a lawyer, when they are being questioned by the police, and when they are on trial. Juveniles accused of crimes in a delinquency proceeding must be afforded many of the same due process rights as adults, such as the right … In re Gault, 387 U.S. 1 (1967), was a landmark case decided by the Supreme Court of the United States in 1967. The sheriff left no notice for Gerald’s parents, who had to figure out on their own where Gerald went. In re Gault, 387 U.S. 1 (1967), was a landmark U.S. Supreme Court decision in which the Primary Holding was that the Due Process Clause of the 14th Amendment applies to juvenile defendants as well as to adult defendants. United States Supreme Court. 116 Argued: December 6, 1966 Decided: May 15, 1967. Start studying Chapter 8. After Ms. Cook filed a complaint, Mr. Gault and his friend, Ronald Lewis, were taken to the Children’s Detention Home. § 1257 (2) from a judgment of the Supreme Court of Arizona affirming the dismissal of a petition for a writ of habeas corpus. This is an appeal under 28 U.S.C. Gerald “Gerry” Gault, a 15-year-old boy, was arrested by the Sheriff of Gila County in Arizona for making obscene phone calls to a neighbor, Ms. Cook, on June 6, 1964. In Re Gault, 1967 Summary of the Case In June of 1964, in Gila County, Arizona a complaint was filed by a Mrs. Cook to the local sheriff stating that she had received an obscene phone call. IN RE GAULT(1967) No. In In re Gault, 387 U.S. 1 (1967), the U.S. Supreme Court held that juveniles facing delinquency prosecutions must be afforded the due process protected by the Fourteenth Amendment.The case is viewed as turning point in the constitutional rights of juveniles. In the landmark decision In re Gault, 387 U.S. 1 (1967), the United States Supreme Court established the principle that juvenile courts must afford standard procedures and protections guaranteed by the Constitution in juvenile adjudication proceedings.The Court held that, in accordance with the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, juveniles are entitled … It was the first time that the Supreme Court held that children facing delinquency prosecution have many of the same legal rights as adults in criminal court, including the right to an attorney, the right to remain silent, the right to notice of the charges, and the right to a full hearing on the merits of the case. In re Gault (1967) Name: Reading An Unfair Detention In 1964, an Arizona sheriff took 15-year-old Gerald Gault into custody after a woman complained Gerald and another boy made an indecent phone call. In re Gault is the landmark 1967 case in which the U.S. Supreme Court extended several constitutional rights to children prosecuted within juvenile justice systems. Although the call was traced to the Gault home there was no proof as to exactly who had made the call or spoken the obscene words. Learn vocabulary, terms, and more with flashcards, games, and other study tools. 99 Ariz. 181, 407 P.2d 760 (1965). While these rights had long been accorded adults prosecuted in criminal courts, American courts had … In Re Gault was a landmark decision issued by the United States Supreme Court that ultimately established that under the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution, a juvenile involved in a delinquency hearing must be afforded similar due process rights as is afforded to an adult.